Edirol HQ-OR Orchestral Software Synthesiser videos
There are currently no videos for this product. If you are registered with us you may log in to add additional videos related to this product. You can also register an account to add a related video.Edirol HQ-OR Orchestral Software Synthesiser Reviews
Review
I am currently writing an orchestral overture for my book and use this software in conjunction with Cakewalk Producer.
Its getting a little old, and for its price Garritan Personal Orchestra is a much deeper library. However HQ is easier to configure, as you just keep on adding instruments, where I found with GPO it is a bit of a pain, and you have to create sets of instruments in batches.
The Piano in HQ is poor, so I think if you want to add a grand into the mix, you should look to add a Steinberg synth or something. A decent piano should be the staple of any library, and therefore I suggest you get a soundfont rather than a software synth and have the piano permanently set to MIDI channel 0. I've managed to create a nifty rendition of Beehoven's 5th Piano Concerto using such with HQ.
A good synth is not necessarily about how accurate things sounds, but how well they all blend together, and I found they blend well with HQ, with solo strings being easily stands apart in a forest of full strings. The brass section also seem to blend well, and the winds too, so not much to fault it.
A decent CPU, say a core duo 2GHz will allow you to simulate fairly reasonable orchestras in real-time, but if you are really heavy on the instrumentation then you may start getting glitches and it is best to render to a WMA or similar for the final result.
When it was released, 2002 I think, it was really great value and top of the class for its price range, but it is dated a bit now, and £200 is a little steep when competitors are producing libraries 20x the sample size for the same price. On the other hand, all that extra performance takes CPU and memory, and Windows XP 32-bit caps out at 2 gigabyte, so being more compact does have its advantages.
I prefer HQ to Reason as I never write pop music and HQ is optimized for serious music. The gubbins in Reason just gets in the way if all you want to do is render orchestral music.
As with all synths there will always be something in this library that may be better suited to a particular passage than anything else. Using this in conjunction with GPO will be better that GPO on its own.
If you are a student of music more of computers, then HQ is simple and fast and thus productive for musical creativity.
Edirol HQ-OR Orchestral Software Synthesiser News
-
PreSonus FireStudio 2626 FireWire audio/midi interface with ADAT I/O
£519.00
Save 7%
Free Delivery*
RRP£ 564.09
More In stock

